MyBudget360: Why the Fed Wants to Destroy the US Dollar and Continue the ‘Failed Bailouts’ of the Banking Sector

28 Nov

The shadow bailout of the commercial real estate industry – bailing out the Ritz, failed million dollar unit condo projects, and buying empty shopping malls. Why the Fed wants to destroy the US dollar and continue the failed bailouts of the banking sector.

It is amazing that so little information about commercial real estate has made it onto the mainstream media.  Few in the public realize that commercial real estate (CRE) has actually fallen harder than residential real estate yet 99.9 percent of all media coverage has been strictly on residential real estate.  The CRE market is enormous with over $3 trillion in CRE loans still outstanding and festering on the balance sheet of banks.  At one point, CRE values reached over $6 trillion in the US with $3 trillion in loans.  Today, CRE values are down to roughly $3.3 trillion yet the loan amount still hovers at $3 trillion.  This is the disastrous end game of being underwater in real estate.  While people fill the stores this holiday season consuming money they don’t have (after all nothing says thank you America like buying imported goods) property values are still in the dark levels of the trough.  The banking sector is doing a complicated shadow bailout through quantitative easing, ignoring missed payments, rolling over CRE loans, and ultimately trying to sucker taxpayers into paying the entire bill.  Ultimately this shadow bailout has been going on for years and no one seems to even care.

Contrary to what banks are publicly stating CRE values have collapsed:

commercial real estate values nov 2010

Source:  MIT

CRE values are down over 47 percent since their peak in 2008.  The above index combines all CRE projects including industrial and commercial properties.  Those strip malls that people are flying into during the holiday seasons are all backed by large amounts of debt.  Banks are hoping that store owners have a strong enough holiday season to justify stronger rents into 2011.  But how are you going to raise rents when retail stores can only charge a certain amount to a country that has seen stagnant wages for over a decade? Foot traffic is high because consumers simply have the habit of going out and consuming.  But are they consuming in the same quantities as they did in 2005 or 2006?  That is highly unlikely yet many of the CREW loans are valued at peak levels.  As we have discussed, credit card companies have pulled back furiously in terms of credit lines offered to Americans.  This was the life blood of the spending bonanza of the last decade.

You know what country had a giant amount of commercial real estate?


“(NY Times) In addition, Ireland’s European creditors reckon, if they can just hold on for a few years, perhaps there will be a recovery in asset values. But real estate prices rose dramatically in Ireland over the last decade – quadrupling by some measures. And fiscal contraction – either higher taxes or lower government spending or both, as negotiated with the I.M.F. and E.U. – is unlikely to help the residential real estate market (so far most of the damage has been in commercial real estate.)

It is true that Irish mortgages are “recourse” — that is, you can’t just turn in the keys and walk away from a property as you can in many parts of the United States. On the other hand, Irish residents can leave the country – moving to Britain or the United States is a well-established tradition for many families. And how can an Irish lender enforce debts when someone has emigrated?”

The math behind the CRE deals was poorly construed and didn’t bet on cash flow scenarios but hoped on continued appreciation.  There is no way that some of these strip malls in the US will ever justify current prices.  Unlike residential real estate, there is no “emotional value” in buying a CRE property.  It is purely financial.  You either make money or you don’t.  Banks right now are bleeding money in CRE deals but they keep pretending all is well and with the aid of the Federal Reserve they hope to destroy the US dollar enough so that in the end, the loans will inflate away.  Is this the end game?  Are we going to be happy to see a $10 loaf of bread and $5 gasoline just so banks can keep strip mall and failed condo project loans on their books?

And if you think it is only small time properties going under, try looking at this:


“(WSJ) The developers of the Ritz-Carlton Highlands hotel at Lake Tahoe apparently have leaned a little too far over their skis. Bank of America Corp., the lead lender in the hotel’s $157 million mortgage, has filed a default notice against the property.

Developer and owner East West Partners, based in Avon, Colo.,  is “talking daily” with its lenders to resolve the situation, East West senior partner Blake Riva said. At issue: $10 million of the loan has matured without being paid, and the lenders want East West to pitch in another $8 million of capital.

Otherwise, East West and Ritz-Carlton, a unit of Marriott International Inc., say the hotel is doing well. Like many mountain-resort businesses, the Ritz is temporarily closed and slated to reopen by mid-May, after the “mud season” passes and vacationers return to the area on the California-Nevada border.”

Yes, the Ritz is a “poor” property that we need to bailout.  No wonder why the Fed has conspired with banks to create this enormous shadow bailout of the CRE market.  If we look at the mortgage backed securities of CRE debt we can see that the problems are still building up in the pipeline:

cre mbs debt

Source:  Zero Hedge

Ultimately the shadow bailout of the CRE industry is occurring because there is zero political will to bailout places like failed condo projects in Las Vegas where units sell for $1 million, or the Ritz Carlton, or buying up vacant shopping malls.  The banking sector is still largely insolvent but as long as they can pretend that CRE values are inflated and the Fed gets busy destroying the dollar (i.e., QE1, QE2, QE?), they may ultimately succeed.  Yet their idea of success is likely hurtful to working and middle class Americans. After all, it isn’t like the system has reformed in the last four years since the Great Recession hit so why should we expect anything different?


Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1. Pippo Schillaci

    November 30, 2010 at 7:24 am

    Eventually, the only way to handle the current debt situation will be debt forgiveness, perhaps on an international level.

    I find it just that the lenders bare the burden as they are the most responsible for the problem.